Skip to main content

About your Search

20121117
20121117
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4 (some duplicates have been removed)
heck from nevada, a member of the house committee. he was in the hearing and he heard general petraeus and sir, i've got to ask you, are you satisfied with david petraeus's testimony about the events that took the lives of ambassador chris stevens and three other americans? >> well, i am, kelly. i am he' satisfied with the testimony of general petraeus, but there's still unanswered questions that we're waiting to be answered by the administration and that is, what was known by the administration and when did they know it. general petraeus came before us on september 14th and gave his best assessment of the situation at that time and came back yesterday to reiterate many points and tell us where the inintelligence changed from when he first had come before us on september 14th, but what we do know is that the talking points that were put together and released by the cia were changed by the time they were presented on the sunday morning talk shows by ambassador rice, so the question, why were they changed, who changed them and what was the purpose. >> kelly: and that seems to be the majo
, young people flying to arizona, to nevada, working side by side to build this country back up. not just hard infrastructure, but working in day care centers, child care centers. this could be a generation-defining thing that would be more economically efficient than putting people back to work. >> just to take all the toy out of the idea of us think being a progressive future. the reality is the last time that we did an attack on the economic problem, the economic crisis, governors were given money, right, in the stimulus. but what did most of them do? they reduced their public sector work force. most of the job decline has been because governors, states directly -- >> so did the federal government. >> but wait, wait. that was after the stimulus money wore out. the stimulus money that was given to states and local governments, about $240 billion kept local -- public servants at work, kept governments from laying off people, kept governments fixing the potholes. and that wore out, we didn't replace it. >> but at the federal level, we had also reductions in the federal work force. we're g
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4 (some duplicates have been removed)